it's a lot harder to kill multiple people with a knife than it is to fire off several rounds from a firearm. talk about red herrings...you just stated a years worth of that catch...
The idea that increased gun related suicides is a measure of increased gun ownership in a state is not my creation. That came form the CDC. Just because it flies in the face of your NRA worship doesn't make it false. Pot...Kettle...your statement is 100% anecdotal. It has nothing to do with total suicides...just gun suicides. please rectify your rectal cranial inversion Scott. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Again something I'll have to dig up but from what I remember there > isn't a corresponding relationship between knives and homicide rates > if firearms are not as available. > > 2 possible reasons, the impulsive nature of firearm use, and with a > knife you have to be face to face with the person. > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Who is to say that the perpetrator would not have harmed these > > students in some other way? Liek with a knife. maybe we should ban > > knives, too. All of them, even 'butter' knives. They can kill people > > you know. > > > > Also, we should ban cars. Cars kill people. Every day...hell probably > > every hour. > > > > Wait...I know its not the guns or the knives or the cars, its the > > people! People are the common denominator there...lets get rid of all > > the people!!!! > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Eric Roberts > > <ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > >> > >> > http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/27/shooting-reported-at-ohio-high-school/?hpt=hp_t1 > >> > >> There would be four students without gunshot wounds if we had tighter > gun > >> control laws. This has nothing to do with criminals. A minor should > not > >> have easy access to a firearm like this. > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Eric Roberts < > >> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > >> > >>> it would be a lot harder for criminals to get guns if they were not so > >>> readily available. Would it stop the flow completely...no...but it > would > >>> certainly reduce the hemorrhaging... Look at what is going on in > states > >>> like AZ where i can sell you a gun, as an individual, with no > background > >>> checks or anything. If i were a criminal, I would be making regular > trips > >>> to AZ and have a whole bunch of legally obtained weapons. Nothing > wrong > >>> with making all gun sales having a required background check and having > >>> cool down periods. That is just counterproductive. With laws like > what > >>> they have in AZ...we may as well just give guns to criminals. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Vivec <gel21...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> The logical fallacy is that if guns were not available to citizens for > >>>> their protection, criminals would not have guns. > >>>> > >>>> On 27 February 2012 11:15, Eric Roberts < > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com > >>>> >wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > If there weren't guns on the street...or they were not as readily > >>>> > available, people wouldn't be getting > >>>> > shot....particularly kids in schools. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347466 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
