I should revise that to somewhat under the guise of state's rights.  It 
is obvious there is another agenda, as others have pointed out.

On 3/16/2012 11:22 AM, PT wrote:
> It is, if you consider it is a comedy in a "I can't believe this" kind
> of way.
>
> So, a Republican is getting into a pissing contest with the Feds over
> states rights that causes harm in the short term. Sounds about right.
> They are forcing the Fed's hand, so in a way, they are cutting off the
> funding.
>
> The reasonable thing to do would be to back off enough to continue to
> get the funding and only make a decision after the rules are clarified
> or the state can find another reliable source of money for the program.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:348662
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to