Not propaganda at all. Syria is well known for having extensive chemical warfare capability. With or without the alleged weapons from Saddam, they have more than enough to devastate a nice sized portion of the Middle East.
With Saddam there was a question if they existed, no matter what Bush said. With Syria, we know they exist and they'll use them without a doubt if push comes to shove. We're not going in and even if we want to, Russia will not let us. The greatest fear is if the weapons are moved over to Hizbalah. Again, no propaganda, real fear. On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Same old propaganda nonsense. Now we have to go to war against Syria > because they have WMD's. Do they serious think the people will fall > for that again? > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:34 PM, GMoney <gm0n3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If true, it begs the question: Why have chemical weapons at all? > > > > I mean....here is a country on the eve of invasion....and instead of > > preparing their most feared "weapon" for defense...they are hiding it in > > another country. Yeeesh. What's the point? Why have a weapon that you > > can't use? ESPECIALLY when the mere presence of said weapon was the > > (stated) reason for the war in the first place! > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:353014 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
