On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You simply do not get it Sam. Regardless of your political viewpoint > (hell I can tolerate right sorts my father in law runs a tea party > group). What the issue is is your deliberate offensiveness. To quite a > few here they see you as your going out of your way to be offensive > and obnoxious. Instead of reasoned debate you want confrontation and > hostility. Most of us are not interested in pissing contests. I have > no problem talking with you if we keep it civil. That said, after all > I've seen you've invested too much in doing the opposite, so I am not > very hopeful.
You just described yourself to the tee. You really are way more offensive than I am and you always from the beginning. > Lets take this bit with Erika. She was bringing up some interesting > stuff, much more specific than the original posting. Your eventual > response to Erika, Sandy and GMoney were very telling. I'm going to > quote Sandy here because what she wrote I find very telling. Erika > Wow. I so thought this group would find this cool. Especially the Ruby on Rails class. meh. Me > They were posted here about six months ago. I would see that as her being rude and me being informative. But to you her and Sandy my response was obnoxious. I wonder why that is. > Sam you have taken on a role that is not intended to engender the > respect and friendship of your peers. Now lets look at your response > to Sandy's statement. Instead of figuring a response that would > diffuse that prototype of you, you respond right in character: Sandy has no reason to attack me. She's an extreme lefty that hates to see her ideological bubble popped by facts. That's all she has. I don't blame her but if she wants to live in a bubble she should do so. Don't go out in public and cry when you hear truths. > Rationalize you're hate? I assume you mean your hate. That is entirely > what pisses people off about you. Grammar mistakes? > There were any number of different > ways you could have answered that would have said the same, but not > had the same negative offensive attitude. This is exactly what I am > referring to. You realize I wasn't talking to her and I ignored her first unprovoked dig against me. She had to come back for a second insult and you find fault with me for pointing that out? What I see is a lefty cocoon and when people point out flaws you insult, cry and then filter. It's really childish and I find it odd you're adults that can function in the real world. > You seem to have the attitude that no matter what you > have to respond with hostility. Seriously, its something that needs to > change, its really for your own benefit, not ours. The rest of us can > easily filter you out but just often enough you have something > valuable to contribute. Most of the people on this mailing list would > prefer more of that and less of the frothing at the mouth screeds. You > may (and probably) think differently on this issue but something to > consider, is the mass shunning and contempt worth it in the end? Don't you post frothing at the mouth screed daily about Republicans being evil or Americans being stupid? If you stop posting that type of rubbish nobody has to point out the flaws in your thinking, what you refer to as personal attacks. . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:353338 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
