Sigh Sam thank you for demonstrating what I was referring to. Can you not discuss anything without personal attacks?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> You simply do not get it Sam. Regardless of your political viewpoint >> (hell I can tolerate right sorts my father in law runs a tea party >> group). What the issue is is your deliberate offensiveness. To quite a >> few here they see you as your going out of your way to be offensive >> and obnoxious. Instead of reasoned debate you want confrontation and >> hostility. Most of us are not interested in pissing contests. I have >> no problem talking with you if we keep it civil. That said, after all >> I've seen you've invested too much in doing the opposite, so I am not >> very hopeful. > > You just described yourself to the tee. You really are way more > offensive than I am and you always from the beginning. > > >> Lets take this bit with Erika. She was bringing up some interesting >> stuff, much more specific than the original posting. Your eventual >> response to Erika, Sandy and GMoney were very telling. I'm going to >> quote Sandy here because what she wrote I find very telling. > > > Erika > Wow. I so thought this group would find this cool. Especially > the Ruby on > Rails class. meh. > > Me > They were posted here about six months ago. > > I would see that as her being rude and me being informative. > But to you her and Sandy my response was obnoxious. I wonder why that is. > >> Sam you have taken on a role that is not intended to engender the >> respect and friendship of your peers. Now lets look at your response >> to Sandy's statement. Instead of figuring a response that would >> diffuse that prototype of you, you respond right in character: > > Sandy has no reason to attack me. She's an extreme lefty that hates to > see her ideological bubble popped by facts. That's all she has. I > don't blame her but if she wants to live in a bubble she should do so. > Don't go out in public and cry when you hear truths. > >> Rationalize you're hate? I assume you mean your hate. That is entirely >> what pisses people off about you. > > Grammar mistakes? > >> There were any number of different >> ways you could have answered that would have said the same, but not >> had the same negative offensive attitude. This is exactly what I am >> referring to. > You realize I wasn't talking to her and I ignored her first unprovoked > dig against me. She had to come back for a second insult and you find > fault with me for pointing that out? > > What I see is a lefty cocoon and when people point out flaws you > insult, cry and then filter. It's really childish and I find it odd > you're adults that can function in the real world. > >> You seem to have the attitude that no matter what you >> have to respond with hostility. Seriously, its something that needs to >> change, its really for your own benefit, not ours. The rest of us can >> easily filter you out but just often enough you have something >> valuable to contribute. Most of the people on this mailing list would >> prefer more of that and less of the frothing at the mouth screeds. You >> may (and probably) think differently on this issue but something to >> consider, is the mass shunning and contempt worth it in the end? > > Don't you post frothing at the mouth screed daily about Republicans > being evil or Americans being stupid? If you stop posting that type of > rubbish nobody has to point out the flaws in your thinking, what you > refer to as personal attacks. > > . > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:353346 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
