The Vul study debunked the use of fMRI to determine what a person is thinking. It was a magic potion used in many studies to prove liberals are smarter. So they analyzed several studies that used them, contacted the others and proved none we're accurate. That by using fMRI one can assume whatever results they were looking for.
. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Larry C. Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The Kanai, et al study used a very different approach to the image > analysis.http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(11)00289-2#ExperimentalProcedures > > So as I said, while the Vul et al study is interesting and has very > valid criticisms its not relevant here. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:357504 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
