what part of
*Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our
very existence and survival.... To deny this fundamental freedom on so
unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these
statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of
equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all
the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth
Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by
invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to
marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual
and cannot be infringed by the State.*

Don't you understand?

Really Sam quit while you're behind in this case.


On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> It does not. It's a persons opinion as applied to race. The right he refers
> to is the long established traditional marriage between a man and a woman.
>
> .
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > Virginia vs Loving, 1967 fully established marriage as a basic civil
> right.
> > try again.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > So you do agree with the statement that if you don't support gay
> marriage
> > > you hate gays. That's just bizarre. Most of my gay friends don't give a
> > > rats ass about gay marriage and they don't hate gays. Only the ones
> that
> > > hate hero-sexuals do. In my experience.
> > >
> > > Marriage isn't a constitutional right but somehow, now, gay marriage
> is?
> > > And the way they did that was to label all opposed as haters? A sad day
> > > indeed.
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok then, I have a serious question (or series of questions):
> > > >
> > > > For what other reason, besides bigotry, would someone oppose gay
> > > marriage?
> > > > What possible argument could anyone have to oppose gay marriage that
> > > would
> > > > not contain the sense that for some reason a "straight marriage" is
> > > > superior to a "gay marriage"?
> > > >
> > > > And if you believe gay marriage is inferior, or harmful, purely
> because
> > > of
> > > > the participants sexual orientation.....then how are you NOT being
> > > bigoted
> > > > against gays????
> > > >
> > > > And as a side bar...why does someone who DOES support gay marriage
> > (you),
> > > > feel such an obligation to prop up those who oppose it??? You don't
> > need
> > > to
> > > > protect conservatives from me....if they aren't bigoted, I won't
> attack
> > > > them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Calling someone a bigot because of lack of understand of the facts
> is
> > > > never
> > > > > funny. It's promoting hate to paint someone with a legitimate legal
> > > > > position as a hater. The only way that can be even a little funny
> is
> > >  if
> > > > > you truly believed he hates gays.
> > > > >
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:21 PM, GMoney <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luckily I don't have that attitude, so you have misread me (once
> > > > again).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was just asking a question. Satire always takes a person's
> views,
> > > > good
> > > > > or
> > > > > > bad, and exaggerates them. YOu call it hate because it's making
> fun
> > > of
> > > > a
> > > > > > position you agree with. I call it sort-of funny...but not all
> that
> > > > > > original.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Sam <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Really?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So you must also believe that Scalia and everyone else that
> > didn't
> > > > > agree
> > > > > > > with this legal decision hates gays. You really need to get
> past
> > > the
> > > > > > "agree
> > > > > > > with me or you're a bigot" attitude.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just saying
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:50 PM, GMoney <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > what's hateful about it?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sam <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ignorant hate disguised as humor.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yeah.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Cameron Childress <
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/03/bitter-scalia-leaves-us.html
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365015
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to