Any scientific theory that is not law has arguments against. I don't see a problem with giving the pros and cons to any good theory. This argument was presented as trying to add creation science when the article says they just want the books to be thorough.
. On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:07 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Religious conservatives serving on state textbook review panels have > > criticized several proposed high school biology textbooks for not > including > > arguments against Charles Darwins theory of evolution. > > > > Oh the horror! I guess the law of evolution doesn't have arguments > against? > > > > Yes, the horror. Why would you want your children learning anything but > science in a science class, Sam? There are NO scientific arguments against > evolutions. Sure, it's not an airtight theory, but there is no alternative > SCIENCE to be taught.....why teach ANYTHING biblically based in a science > class? Why??????? > > I don't understand why you insist on being argumentative on this point when > you AGREE with everything i just said. Is it just because you like to be > contrarian? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366973 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
