Companies that spend more time in court than they do competing - Bad. "Putting the f*cked in dot com" also doesn't help their rep, not to mention the huge ego problem they had up until their balls were kicked in by people starting to realize that $20k is too much for a server.
Adam. > -----Original Message----- > From: cfhelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:26 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: whaaaaaa > > > What!? I am confused... > > I must have missed the memo SUN Bad Microsoft Good? > > :) > > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:57 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: whaaaaaa > > No, a few years ago Sun was wanting Windows to either ship > with Sun's JVM or > take the JVM out all together. MS called their bluff and > decided to take the > JVM out all together. Sun wet their pants and started suing > some more to get > it back. > > I don't like Sun. I would feel better about java if it > weren't for them > having control of it. Better watch out, if developers start > dropping Java, > Sun might feel obliged to sue, forcing them into using it > again. It wouldn't > be far off from what they're currently trying to pull :) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:50 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: whaaaaaa > > > > > > Isn't it that they have to include sun's jre? And not their > own hacked > > and partly incompatible jre, I thought the whole crux of the > > problem was > > that ms had been messing about with java and sun weren't happy. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 16 January 2003 18:54 > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: whaaaaaa > > > > While I agree with Sun's winning the 20 million dollar > lawsuit a while > > back, I think this is just stupid. They shouldn't be forced > to include > > Java, and there should be a time limit involved if they are. > > > > I may be reading the situation wrong, but it's seems kind of like a > > double jeopardy situation. Sun already won a seperate > lawsuit against > > Microsoft, and now Microsoft is being penalized for the > same thing in > > as part of the antitrust case. In the previous case, > Microsoft is not > > allowed to distribute Java after 2008 (maybe earlier?) iirc, without > > renegotiating a new licensing agreement with Sun. Now the court is > > saying that Microsoft has to include Java. > > > > This is setting up a sweet little niche for Sun, one that they don't > > deserve imo. At least under Windows it is faster, and easier to > > program an application using .Net than Java. > > > > -- > > jon > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thursday, January 16, 2003, 1:16:51 PM, you wrote: > > CA> whaaaaa... I'm Sun Microsystems. > > > > CA> whaaaa..... don't put that software in your operating system. > > > > CA> whaaa... I think I'll sue you for putting that in there. > > > > CA> whaaa.... why did you take that software out of your operating > > system. > > > > CA> whaaaa.... now we're screwed. > > > > CA> whaaaa... I think I'll sue you for not putting it in your > > operating > > system. > > > > CA> whaaaa.... we won. > > > > > > CA> whaaaaa... we're pathetic. > > > > CA> whaaa.... where's my ba ba. whaaaa. > > > > CA> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
