But then, why has he changed his tune? He has stated that there is a link between Al Caeda and Saddam publicly.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >It doesn't say anything such thing. As a matter of fact even says that Bush >resisted at first after the Sept. 11th attacks. > >Page 3 Para 4 > >"But despite the aggressive language, there was no sign that he had accepted >the logic of a pre-emptive strike against Saddam. After Sept. 11, he >initially resisted making Iraq an early target of American might. Wolfowitz, >says a Republican lawmaker, "was like a parrot bringing [Iraq] up all the >time. It was getting on the President's nerves." At one point in the Camp >David meeting after Sept. 11, Wolfowitz tried to persuade Bush to back a >scheme to lop off the southern part of Iraq, including Basra, its third >largest city, and some important oil fields. That went nowhere. And no >matter how hard the intelligence agencies looked, they couldn't come up with >a link between Saddam and Sept. 11 that might persuade Bush of the virtues >of an early strike." > > >Tim > >-----Original Message----- >From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:32 PM >To: CF-Community >Subject: Re: Bush decided to "take out Saddam" in March > > >Lon Lentz wrote: > > > >> Logical fallacy. The story has nothing to do with whether there is or >>isn't Al Qaeda involvement. >> >> >> >> >> >I see no logical fallacy. It states that this was a goal before >9/11/2001. Pres. Bush saw a way to move on Iraq under the guise of the >war on terrorism. Iraq has not been exposed to have committed any >terroristic acts, therefore the administration had to make a link from >Iraq to a terrorist organization. Al Caeda just happened to be on the >public's mind at the time. > > > >> Besides, it's a war on Terrorism, not just Al Qaeda. And the "Regime >>Change" policy for Iraq started under Bill "That Pantload" Clinton....my >>fingers feel dirty just for typing his name.....<shudder> >> >> >> >> >> >According to the Nightline story ><url:http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nightline/DailyNews/pnac_030310.html>, >it was started by a conservative group during Clinton's presidency of >which 10 are now part of the current administration. > >As to Clinton, I'm not sure which is worse, a president who screws a few >other women other than his wife, or a president who screws a lot more >people out of money because of his stock sell off. :) > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
