lol

-----Original Message-----
From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: FW: An apology to the U.S.......


I wouldn't put it past you. ;-D

On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:02:55 -0500, John Stanley wrote:

> or we could just label your government as a dictatorship, and then invade.
> ;-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 12:51 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: FW: An apology to the U.S.......
> 
> 
> Next it will be out fresh water supply...then our lumber...then our....
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:38:35 -0500, John Stanley wrote:
> 
> > right....because they can find another customer that will pay their
prices
> > and buy as much....
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 12:32 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: FW: An apology to the U.S.......
> > 
> > 
> > Canada will just stop sending the US our oil and gas.
> > 
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:08:26 -0500, Harkins,Patrick wrote:
> > 
> > > I think you should be careful when you talk about Canada as a whole. I
> am
> > > from Canada and I have mixed feelings about the whole thing.
> > > 
> > > I can't speak for the government, but I can tell you that the
government
> > is
> > > not anti-American and it is not pro-Hussein.
> > > Canada has a strong record of supporting international diplomacy, so
> their
> > > position makes sense from that perspective.
> > > 
> > > Personally I am glad to see someone trying to kick Hussein's butt, but
I
> > am
> > > also horrified and saddened by the civilian deaths.
> > > 
> > > I guess the U.S.'s action represents a slap in the face to the U.N.,
but
> > > maybe they needed that slap. On the other hand, that doesn't mean that
> all
> > > other governments should necessarily join in that slap. Privately many
> in
> > > the Canadian goverment may applaud it while still recognizing the need
> to
> > > stand on what they perceive as the side of international law and
> > diplomacy.
> > > 
> > > I know that many in Canada support the US-led action and wish our
> > government
> > > had acted differently, and certainly many like myself support the U.S.
> > > troops regardless of their feelings about the whole action. Others
feel
> > > strongly that the troops shouldn't have gone in. John Stanley's
> satirical
> > > statement about clarity points to the shades of grey that are felt by
> > people
> > > here just as much as they are in the States. I don't see how anyone
can
> > > expect consensus anyways, since war is about division - not unity.
> > > 
> > > Personally I think Bush is a cowboy, and brought the Canadian
> government's
> > > reaction on himself. After all our government had put forward a
> compromise
> > > proposal that the US decided to reject (based of course on their
> > assessment
> > > of France and Germany's position). It would have been pretty unlikely
> for
> > > them to have taken sides with the Bush administration. 
> > > 
> > > Personally, I find that Canadians can be arrogant and negative prigs
at
> > > times and the best of us know it, even if we rarely admit it. And I
> detest
> > > the anti-Americanism I sometimes see here, especially since it's so
> > > knee-jerk. I hate prejudice in any form.
> > > 
> > > -Patrick
> > > 
> > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Sent: April 2, 2003 9:47 AM
> > > >To: CF-Community
> > > >Subject: Re: FW: An apology to the U.S.......
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Larry, that is BS.
> > > >
> > > >Canada as a whole, and the elected Gov in particular, have 
> > > >been _very_ clear in their feelings and participation in this war.
> > > >
> > > >If they could (in their own good concience) let us hang by 
> > > >withdrawing their forces in these other areas, I think they would.
> > > >
> > > >They are _not_ participating in this war. 
> > > >
> > > >Unless you are saying that this war = the war on terrorism, 
> > > >then obviously the Canadians are helping in that bigger war.
> > > >
> > > >But at least they are not (like the French and Germans) 
> > > >actively opposing us in this war.
> > > >
> > > >Just my opinion,
> > > >Jerry Johnson
> > > >
> > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/02/03 08:45AM >>>
> > > >Typically Canadian but very apt.
> > > >
> > > >One point that has been pissing me off. I'm hearing whiny 
> > > >complaints by 
> > > >various people in the area about Canada's participation in the 
> > > >Iraqi War. 
> > > >Yes Canadian forces as a whole are not participating. However 
> > > >to set the 
> > > >record straight, there are 7 ships from the Canadian navy in 
> > > >the region 
> > > >(the Red Sea and the Gulf) participating in the anti-terrorism 
> > > >patrols - 
> > > >freeing up US navy assets btw. There is also  another Canadian 
> > > >battalion is 
> > > >heading over to Afghanistan, while special operations units, 
> > > >such as the 
> > > >JTF2 are also working with US forces in that theater.
> > > >
> > > >So do me a favour, cut the bs about Canada's non-participation.
> > > >
> > > >larry
> > > >
> > > >At 05:11 AM 4/2/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> > > >>Cute. Very cute.
> > > >>And quite smug.
> > > >>I enjoyed it, even while feeling insulted.
> > > >>:-)
> > > >>
> > > >>-Ben
> > > >>
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >Came across this today, written by Rick Mercer:
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >On behalf of Canadians everywhere I'd like to offer an 
> > > >apology to
> > > >> > >  >the United States of America. We haven't been getting 
> > > >along very
> > > >> > >  >well recently and for that, I am truly sorry.
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >I'm sorry we called George Bush a moron. He is a moron but,
it
> > > >> > >  >wasn't nice of us to point it out. If it's any 
> > > >consolation, the fact
> > > >> > >  >that he's a moron shouldn't reflect poorly on the 
> > > >people of America.
> > > >> > >  >After all it's not like you actually elected him.
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >I'm sorry about our softwood lumber. Just because we 
> > > >have more trees
> > > >> > >  >than you doesn't give us the right to sell you lumber 
> > > >that's cheaper
> > > >> > >  >and better than your own.
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >I'm sorry we beat you in Olympic hockey. In our 
> > > >defense I guess our
> > > >> > >  >excuse would be that our teams were much, much, much, 
> > > >much better
> > > >> > >  >than yours.
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >I'm sorry we burnt down your white house during the 
> > > >war of 1812. I
> > > >> > >  >notice you've rebuilt it! It's Very Nice. I'm sorry about
your
> > > >> > >  >beer. I know we had nothing to do with your beer but, 
> > > >we Feel your
> > > >> > >  >Pain.
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean, when you're
going
> > > >> > >  >up against a crazed dictator, you wanna have your 
> > > >friends by your
> > > >> > >  >side. I realize it took more than two years before you 
> > > >guys pitched
> > > >> > >  >in against Hitler, But that was different. Everyone knew he
had
> > > >> > >  >weapons.
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >And finally on behalf of all Canadians, I'm sorry that we
> > > >> > >  >are constantly apologizing for things in a passive 
> > > >aggressive way
> > > >> > >  >which is really a thinly veiled criticism. I sincerely 
> > > >hope that
> > > >> > >  >you're not upset over this. We've seen what you do to 
> > > >countries you
> > > >> > >  >get upset with.
> > > >> > >  >
> > > >> > >  >Thank you.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89
70.5
                                

Reply via email to