Yeah, I geeked out - it's in my nature.  Actually, it's by far the most
stable machine I've got.  No extraneous junk on there, just SSH, Samba
and a few other useful things - I have Webmin on there to simplify a few
things, but it's not necessary.

- Jim

Josh Remus wrote:

>You could certainly do the same XP/2k with directory access permissions and
>user accounts.  No need to overcomplicate with Linux unless you just want to
>geek out.
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 2:54 PM
>  To: CF-Community
>  Subject: Re: understanding bluetooth and 802.11b
>
>
>  Hiding any file (or directory or multi-terabyte archive of MILF
>  pornography, you naughty lad) isn't that hard to do, especially with a
>  network.  Just put Linux with a nice, well-protected filesystem on it on
>  the network.  Run Samba, and set it up to only allow access to your
>  account, or to require a password to access that directory.  You can
>  probably do it in a few hours.
>
>  - Jim
>
>  Kevin Graeme wrote:
>
>  > If email is your primary goal, I recommend using IMAP instead of POP if
>you
>  >can. I tried POP mail on the PocketPC and it quickly became difficult to
>  >manage. If you use IMAP and pre-filter email at the server, it's much
>easier
>  >on a PDA.
>  >
>  >KVM switching certainly works, but the multi-user features in XP are
>really
>  >nice. Or in Panther if you swing that way. Of course, IMO if you have to
>  >hide your porn then there's a bigger problem...;-)
>  >
>  >My home office is a 10x12 room. There's desk space for 2 and we often
>both
>  >sit in the room and surf the web. Broadband rocks. I think of it as our
>  >modern library/sitting parlor. Definitely no "when can I check my mail"
>type
>  >problems. And when we have guests, they set up a laptop in their room,
>  >kitchen table or whatever.
>  >
>  >-Kevin
>  >
>  >----- Original Message -----
>  >From: "Charlie Griefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:15 AM
>  >Subject: Re: understanding bluetooth and 802.11b
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >>actually most of her computer usage is checking e-mail, which is what
>i'd
>  >>
>  >>
>  >anticipate she does from her ipaq if I'm at the computer.
>  >
>  >
>  >>Right now we've both got comps set up, but we need to consolidate some
>  >>
>  >>
>  >space.  Her original idea was that we share a computer...but I'm just not
>  >that comfortable with her being that close to my porn <g>)...so we're
>  >throwing the two boxes together with a kvm cable.
>  >
>  >
>  >>It's something we do need to do (the space consolidation...sister-in-law
>  >>
>  >>
>  >moved in, so we've lost a 20x20 sq foot room which served as the
>  >office)...i'm just trying to proactively avoid the "are you going to be
>on
>  >much longer?  i need to check my e-mail" or the "can i just jump in real
>  >quick and check my e-mail" type questions  : )
>  >
>  >
>  >>charlie
>  >>
>  >>  ----- Original Message -----
>  >>  From: Kevin Graeme
>  >>  To: CF-Community
>  >>  Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:50 AM
>  >>  Subject: Re: understanding bluetooth and 802.11b
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  In my experience, web surfing on a the PocketPC 320x240 screen is not
>  >>
>  >>
>  >fun.
>  >
>  >
>  >>  It's cool that it can do it, but sites just aren't accommodating. The
>  >>
>  >>
>  >1945
>  >
>  >
>  >>  has the 2003 OS which has much better wireless support and an improved
>  >>  Pocket Internet Explorer, so it might be a little better than what I
>  >>
>  >>
>  >see. I
>  >
>  >
>  >>  think though that it will be years (if ever) before web site devs
>start
>  >>  using the power of CSS to create PDA compatible sites.
>  >>
>  >>  Personally, I find that the best use for the wireless so far is
>  >>
>  >>
>  >Messenger,
>  >
>  >
>  >>  IRC, etc.
>  >>
>  >>  BTW, there are great handheld discussion forums at:
>  >>  http://www.brighthand.com
>  >>
>  >>  -Kevin
>  >>
>  >>  ----- Original Message -----
>  >>  From: "Charlie Griefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>  To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>  Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 10:32 AM
>  >>  Subject: Re: understanding bluetooth and 802.11b
>  >>
>  >>  > Hey Kevin:
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Thanks for the info.  Sounds like in the end I'm better off picking
>  >>
>  >>
>  >her up
>  >
>  >
>  >>  the SDIO wi-fi card.  We're presently sharing a computer (well,
>sharing
>  >>
>  >>
>  >a
>  >
>  >
>  >>  keyboard/video/mouse via switch), so I wanted her to be able to check
>  >>
>  >>
>  >her
>  >
>  >
>  >>  e-mail while i'm at the computer (as I frequently am).
>  >>  >
>  >>  > I just didn't want her to have to sacrifice access to the SD storage
>  >>
>  >>
>  >card,
>  >
>  >
>  >>  in case she needed to save or retrieve file(s).  The bright side is
>that
>  >>
>  >>
>  >the
>  >
>  >
>  >>  ipaq 1945 has ~14MB of non-volatile storage built in...which should be
>  >>
>  >>
>  >able
>  >
>  >
>  >>  to serve as temporary storage while she's "surfing" : )
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Thanks again.
>  >>  > Charlie
>  >>  >
>  >>  >   ----- Original Message -----
>  >>  >   From: Kevin Graeme
>  >>  >   To: CF-Community
>  >>  >   Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:12 AM
>  >>  >   Subject: Re: understanding bluetooth and 802.11b
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >   Basically Bluetooth and 802.11x are completely different beasts.
>You
>  >>  can't
>  >>  >   make them directly work together. What you will need to do, as you
>  >>  >   suspected, is either get a 802.11b card for the iPaq or get a
>  >>
>  >>
>  >Bluetooth
>  >
>  >
>  >>  >   access point.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >   Either will work and what you choose depends on your needs.
>802.11x
>  >>  (WiFi)
>  >>  >   has a larger coverage area and offers faster speeds (11mb max for
>  >>
>  >>
>  >'b').
>  >
>  >
>  >>  >   Think of it as "real" networking with no wires. Bluetooth has a
>much
>  >>  smaller
>  >>  >   coverage area, and slower speeds (723kb). Think of Bluetooth as
>  >>
>  >>
>  >wireless
>  >
>  >
>  >>  >   USB.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >   A Bluetooth Access Point will basically act as another wireless
>  >>
>  >>
>  >network
>  >
>  >
>  >>  for
>  >>  >   Bluetooth enabled devices. I haven't used it, so I can't comment
>on
>  >>
>  >>
>  >if
>  >
>  >
>  >>  it's
>  >>  >   a good solution or not. I have a Linksys CF 802.11b card for my
>  >>
>  >>
>  >PocketPC
>  >
>  >
>  >>  and
>  >>  >   it works fine. It sucks the battery down like crazy though.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >   -Kevin
>  >>  >
>  >>  >   ----- Original Message -----
>  >>  >   From: "Charlie Griefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>  >   To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >>  >   Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:21 AM
>  >>  >   Subject: understanding bluetooth and 802.11b
>  >>  >
>  >>  >   > <preface>  i'm a moron when it comes to networking, wired or
>  >>
>  >>
>  >otherwise
>  >
>  >
>  >>  >   </preface>
>  >>  >   >
>  >>  >   > I've got a wireless network at home (standard 802.11b).  Just
>  >>
>  >>
>  >ordered
>  >
>  >
>  >>  my
>  >>  >   wife a new iPaq (1945), which has integrated bluetooth.  Is there
>  >>
>  >>
>  >any
>  >
>  >
>  >>  way to
>  >>  >   make that bluetooth work with my existing network to give her net
>  >>
>  >>
>  >access
>  >
>  >
>  >>  >   from the ipaq?
>  >>  >   >
>  >>  >   > The unit has a secure digital slot which will accept SDIO cards,
>  >>
>  >>
>  >so I
>  >
>  >
>  >>  can
>  >>  >   buy a Wi-Fi SD card...but I'd prefer she didn't have to swap out
>the
>  >>
>  >>
>  >SD
>  >
>  >
>  >>  card
>  >>  >   with her 256MB card every time she wanted to connect...and I'd
>  >>
>  >>
>  >rather
>  >
>  >
>  >>  not
>  >>  >   spend the $ on the SD Wi-Fi card if there's a way to make it work
>  >>
>  >>
>  >with
>  >
>  >
>  >>  the
>  >>  >   existing network.
>  >>  >   >
>  >>  >   > I'm thinking a bluetooth access point somehow connected to the
>  >>  existing
>  >>  >   access point (maybe perhaps?)
>  >>  >   >
>  >>  >   > any info would be appreciated  : )
>  >>  >   >
>  >>  >   > Thx!
>  >>  >   > Charlie
>  >>  >   >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to