Uh, just to ... toss in a statement here. HS+ does not come with CFMX Help files, you have to download that seperately. I don't think HS+ comes with _all_ of the CFMX buttons either (just the basic ones), again, that can be downloaded seperately.
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusionstudio/productinfo/resources/tag_updaters/ http://download.macromedia.com/pub/homesite/updates/cfml_ref.zip ~Todd On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Vernon Viehe wrote: > It's my understanding that HS+ isn't any different from CFStudio 5, except the >updated stuff for CFMX, name change, and of course the UI changes due to the Adobe >lawsuit. I know a lot of people relied upon those UI features to speed their work. > > That lawsuit was finally settled, but I don't know how that might impact future >versions of any Macromedia or Adobe products. > > -Vern > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan F. Hogan > To: CF-Talk > Sent: 9/6/2002 10:57 AM > Subject: RE: Dreamweaver MX opinions (CF Studio opinions?) > > I would like them to complete Homesite+ with the options we had with > Studio. > Studio IMHO was/is much faster to get something done than to fiddle > around > with Dreamweaver. If they want to get rid of Studio let them, as long as > they bring Homesite+ up to par as studio. If they do that they can still > cut > down on a product and leave us all happy. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Brocx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:47 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: FW: Dreamweaver MX opinions (CF Studio opinions?) > > > Is there any chance of brining back Studio? > Dreamweaver is just so cumbersome and intolerably slow (on a p4 1.8) I > tried to use it but it's just can't. A complete waste of money. I find > it so bad that I have had to consider moving to a new markup language. A > language loses a lot of it's functionality when there isn't a decent > editor. Studio was nearly perfect, and seems more so after working with > DW for a couple weeks. Are there any other editors that can take the > place of studio 5 after it's obsolete? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:58 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Dreamweaver MX opinions (CF Studio opinions?) > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2002, at 07:12 , Tony Weeg wrote: > > the biggest pain i thought was, that i didnt get the funtionality > > in non-wysiwyg mode, as i really wanted. i mean, the bitch and pain > > of handcoding the height and width of an image tag, for every image, > > It's true that in code view it doesn't automatically add height and > width > tags but you could easily work in split view mode (with just a small > design view) and use the design view pane to insert images - then it > sets > the height and width automatically based on the image size. You should > submit this via the wishlist form on the web site - it sounds like a > useful enhancement. > > > then im done and on to my passion, GOLF!!! > > Ah, golf... who once said "Golf is a good walk spoiled"? > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
