Paul Hastings wrote: >>ISO/IEC 9075-14:200x(E), available through the usual channels, will tell >>you how the upcomming SQL:2003 standard will define what the behaviour >>of XML and SQL combined has to be. Please base any best practices >>documents on the current working drafts of that standard. > > > that might be hard to do if the big iron boys don't follow the standard. > maybe something about XML capabilities for oracle, sql server, mySQL, > postgreSQL, etc. vs the standard?
I still wouldn't want to invest the effort in that. SQL features generally have a name and a unique identifying code. Just reference those and anybody should be able to find them in the manual for their specific dbms. > not that there's anything i18n inherent to > XML but a good one for general cf content???? I don't think there is anything CF inherent to using XML from the database either ;-) I don't see the difference between extracting a value from a field with XML and extracting a weeknumber from a field with a date. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
