> My reaction would be to bitch. My solution would be to only use CFCs > after rigorous testing LOL.. Interesting...quite different approaches!.
Anyways.. to end the topic... I already submitted the problem.. right after Sean/Mike gave me the Bug forum/Wish List site link. The only 2 confirmations i needed from this whole post was... 1. Nobody on this list has CFMX ODBC working stable. 2. This is not an already acknowledged issue by MM. Wonder how it got this far... Topic closed for me. Joe Eugene > -----Original Message----- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:26 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: ODBC Problems? > > > Joe Eugene wrote: > >>If you have a bug, call Macromedia. Yes, they ask for your creditcard > >>number. No, they won't bill you if it is really a bug (I have *never* > >>been billed and Macromedia support is on the speed dial). > >>If you have a feature request, submit it to the wishform. > > > > > > I hope you are not suggesting i call Macromedia Support and > > ask them.. IF they have CFMX ODBC working stable? > > Just say "I can reproducably get this error if I do this and this". > Worst case is they say "it is filed as bug number X and we will get back > to you". (If they can point you to some part of the documentation with a > setting you have forgotten which fixes it but charge $$$ for that, > wouldn't you be better of then you are now?) > > > > The reason for this question is to find out the root cause > > of the ODBC Connection Failures. Its interesting to know that > > nobody is really curious...why certain things dont work. > > I am a little bit curious. But since I have never gotten any Access ODBC > driver to work reliably at 50+ queries per second*, I am very happy at > the same time with the prospect of having an excuse to ditch ODBC > altogether. > > * Yes, I host crazy people. > > > > If i tell you CFC is not recommended and has problems... > > What will be your solution to that? Use Java Beans? > > My reaction would be to bitch. My solution would be to only use CFCs > after rigorous testing. > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
