> One thing I noticed is that about 90 KB of the initial load is > XML/CSS/JS/HTML. I bet that if HTTP compression were enabled for the > larger files the bandwidth use for the initial load would drop below > quite a bit.
I've always avoided HTML compression because of bugs in various browsers (such as IE handing the compressed data off to plugins such as Flash instead of the uncompressed data). Is this no longer the case? Are people using HTML compression in production environments successfully? Benjamin S. Rogers http://www.c4.net/ v.508.240.0051 f.508.240.0057 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
