Yeah I definitely agree with everything you are saying. Well... mostly.
I'm just saying that traditional navigation schemes transcend the media.
Just because it's done in flash doesn't mean you can't have blue
underline links. Everything can be implemented identically in one or the
other.

But as far a blue links go (or any long standing tradition), just
because it's been this way in the past, doesn't mean we should keep
doing it into the future. Using established proven methodologies for
navigation yes, I think coloring and underlining menu object is just
aesthetic at this point. I agree it may well have been true 3 years ago,
but now users expect visually pleasing sites and applications. (Look at
OSX and WinXP)

Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division


-----Original Message-----
From: Lofback, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Is Flash really THAT good?

> Blue, underlined text is hardly navigation. That's just a common
> identifier for a link, which in HTML is an action, not necessarily
> navigation. A link can do a number of things like execute a javascript
> function or dhtml. 
> 
> Google, since you mention how standard it is, does not use 
> this for it's
> core navigation. Web, Images, Groups, Directory, and News (The four
> categories of google) are represented with blue text in a box. If
> selected the box is blue, if not it's gray. This is hardly a standard,
> but none the less is effective because users are familiar with tabular
> menus.

<CF_UsabilitySoapBox>

Well, this is quibbling over minor differences and word definitions.
And I know I'm blowing against the wind here, but the simple fact is
that users know what to do with blue, underlined text and HTML buttons.
Why deviate from something that users know?  It only makes it harder for
them and increases the likelihood that they won't use your site--unless
they have no place else to go.  Here is the key phrase in your post:

> effective because users are familiar

That is the heart of the matter.

> Every site, whether flash or html, navigate completely different. 

This is pretty much true and it's a negative, not a positive.  On the
web, different != good usability.  All of those sites with
different/unique navigation are harder to use than "standard" blue
underlines and HTML widgets because users have to figure them out--and
they HATE that.  Even if you think, what's the big deal, it only takes a
few minutes?  They HATE to be forced to learn something new when all
they want to do is...whatever...anything but be forced by some web site
to endure their "different" navigation.

Look at Yahoo, eBay, Amazon and Google.  I'd guess they are among the
most heavily used sites and they rely on "standard" light/white
background, dark/black text, blue underlined links and (for the most
part) standard form elements.   Minor differences, but they don't stray
far from the basics.  They know what works.  And we can leverage the
usability of those sites by mimicking their navigation and design
elements.  Most users will know how to navigate a site that looks like
them.  I know this is anathema to all of the web artistes out there, but
it's the truth: the big sites really define usability for the rest of
us.  We ignore it at our peril.

There is room for individuality, but most of the Flash example that were
suggested on the list are shooting themselves in the foot, IMHO.  If we,
as developers, care whether or not our site is usable by the most people
(which means more opportunities for sales/readers/customers/etc) then we
must bow to the simple needs of users and not force our techie-oriented
"user experiences" on them.  And using Flash like most sites do goes
against good usability.

</CF_UsabilitySoapBox>

Man, I need a weekend off!  :)

Chris

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to