http://www.css-discuss.org
-----Original Message----- From: Rafael Alan Bleiweiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:08 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT: Netscape 7.1 Well, I did validate html and it's all clear. Why not XHTML? Cause I'm just now teaching myself enough about CSS to become proficient in it. Haven't even begun to explore XHTML. I did find out that my <!Document... reference was incorrect so I'm going from there... Are there any good CSS lists? What is so strange about that? If you are using elements that are >in HTML 4 but not in 3.2, they will be ignored in 3.2 but >rendered in 4. That is intended behaviour. > >Did you validate your HTML in both cases? >Why not write XHTML? > > > > The real question though is, now that AOL signed another multi-year > > agreement to use the IE engine in AOL <ACK cough - sputter> and laid off > > more NS staff, how long will it be before NS goes completely open source? > >Never. Netscape is just as dead as standalone versions of IE. If >you want a browser that continues to evolve, look at Firebird or >Opera. If you want a communications suite that continues to >evolve, look at Mozilla. > >Jochem > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
