> Sean - so if I understand correctly this means that performance benefits of > named locks over scoped locks (as noted in the <cflock> postings on your > blog) are no longer huge? > > So in summary for shared scope vars scoped locks are not going to result in > the app taking a performance hit. Named locks are primarily for files or > sections of code that need to single thread - correct?
The principles I spoke of in my post still apply, but CFLOCKs with SCOPE="Session" only "key" to the one user's session now. Named locks on code that access the Server or Application scopes, or that try to safeguard non-threadsafe CFX tags by single-threading access to them via named exclusive locks, still work according to what I said earlier. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Member of Team Macromedia Advanced Intensive ColdFusion MX Training ColdFusion MX Master Class: September 22 - 26, 2003 http://www.ColdFusionTraining.com Download CommerceBlocks V2.1 and LoRCAT from http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com The ColdFusion MX Bible is in bookstores now! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
