> well. I did try (secretly trying to prolong this exciting debate)
well, unicode is an important issue to me, has been since cf4.5. i won't
normally let stuff that seems contrary or mis-informed float by. i have all
these bookmarked because my brain is so old i can't recall anything.
> Interesting how an abbreviation can mean two things, not ambiguous at
> all.
i believe jochem might say thats why we need standards ;-) i would guess
that since this has been around the block a few times, the meaning's changed
slightly maybe due to popular use & they just wanted to hang a tag on the
old stuff. i guess i could ask.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
