----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel O'Keefe
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: Joining the dark side - using DWMX
As long as the settlement comes through from the class action lawsuit regarding ALLR stock.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Joining the dark side - using DWMX
ALLAIRE FOREVER!!!!!
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Farmer
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: Joining the dark side - using DWMX
ALLAIRE RULES!!!!
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Watts
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:43 PM
Subject: RE: Joining the dark side - using DWMX
> CFS5 Kicks DWMX ass anytime. It is faster and more stable. I
> don't care what hardware you are on - the bottom line is that
> CFS5 is faster than DWMX on any hardware.
We're talking about a text editor, not a compiler. How fast does it have to
be? On my laptop (which is hardly a blazing machine) Dreamweaver MX 2004
runs well enough that it doesn't slow me down any.
In exchange, it gives me a usable design view, templates, an incredibly
powerful search and replace interface, and all sorts of other stuff I find
very helpful.
There are plenty of things I don't like about Dreamweaver, but they're
outweighed by the good things in my opinion. For that matter, there were
plenty of things I didn't like about CF Studio - it's not like that was
God's gift to text editing, either.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
