attribute within cfmail. I am not talking about just a few e-mails here, I
do have to worry about processing time. Running a loop essentially kills
the server.
You are essentially saying the tag doesn't work right and i agree.
Tyler Clendenin
GSL Solutions
_____
From: Katz, Dov B (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 'bug'? Easy to crash CFMAIL.
Tyler,
2) so why don't you CFLOOP query=, and cfmail inside the loop to solve
this?
-Dov
_____
From: Tyler Clendenin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 'bug'? Easy to crash CFMAIL.
Some things I feel I must point out.
1. Data Integrity is always an issue but why should I waste my
precious cpu
time checking first what the tag is already checking. If this
was truly
intentional I would think that the devs at Macromedia would have
built in a
little more reverse compatibility, Maybe some sort of
attributes called
throwonbademail defaulted to false.
2. My main problem with this is that if you send to a query and
it throws an
error it stops mid e-mail and does not rollback or anything it
only sends
out the first percentage of the e-mail before the bad e-mail
address.
Tyler Clendenin
GSL Solutions
_____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
