all, and that the reason is that Sean got interested in it and so they
decided to try it out in a production environment. This is all heresay of
course. Beest to wait until Sean's back from vacation and let him comment
on it himself.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel R. Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2004 17:24
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II
Jaye,
You can program things from scratch all the time or you can use frameworks
and available resources to make the program more efficiently. The
official
curriculum is always going to be about the base functionality of a
language.
You have to go outside that to learn about frameworks and extensions. The
same is true in all languages. The official Sun curriculum teaches you
how
to develop Java apps and never mentions the tons of available open-source
projects and frameworks available. However, a very large portion of Java
projects will use Apache Struts as their framework as it provides
functionality you don't need to redevelop.
Besides, it's no surprise that MM is using Mach-II since Sean Corfield has
been blogging about it for a while.
Sam
-----------------------------------------------
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Charts: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
-----------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaye Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 12:17 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II
>
> Ken,
>
> Just wanted to clarify why I made the point in the first
> place. The deal was, I went to check out sites of the day.
> Buddha boom, budda bing, the page is crashed. *I* see the
> error page and notice that it's running on Mach
> II. Now here is what I am actually Thinking. Some time
> ago, I attended
> Macromedia CF classes with Fig Leaf in Washington D.C.
> (shameless plug for
> them, but they did a great job and I was very pleased). The approved
> Macromedia training talks about "Macromedia Development"
> methods. Not "Fuse-box", or "Mach II" (though in reality I
> have nothing against either. I just find them not necessary.
> Said another way, you could wear a jacket outside, but you
> don't have to.it's a matter of personal choice). The
> argument goes, We teach you one way (roughly 1,000 per person
> per class.
> hotel, food, beer not included), but we will use something
> different in real world practice. That is comparative to
> Microsoft doing MS Office and building it all on someone
> else's controls. I just find that a bit odd. It also
> implies that the suggested application development methods
> (just take a look at the applications development guide that
> came with your CFMX CD-ROM) is not actually the best method.
> If that is the case, then Macromedia should be supporting the
> most sound application development methods that in their
> documentation.
>
>
>
> // Jaye Morris | Principal Design Technologist
>
> // jayeZERO.com | a design studio
>
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.jayeZERO.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
