That's my point...

Thanks Doug...

Doug Brown schrieb:
>> If we open source Railo and we would be faster in some >cases than other
>> vendors, they could easily adapt our code
>>     
>
> Sure they could adopt your code and make their product faster, but they
> would also still be charging a wholloping price for their product.
>
> Doug B.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gert Franz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 8:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting?
>
>
>   
>> Don't get me wrong, I do not have anything against open source. BUT we
>> are yet to small and I don't think that the community will dig into our
>> tens of thousands of lines of code first to understand it and second to
>> fix it. If Adobe would do it, then this would be different.
>> If we open source Railo and we would be faster in some cases than other
>> vendors, they could easily adapt our code
>>
>> And just like James posted. If you have a decompiler etc. it is already
>> open source.
>>
>> Greetings / GrĂ¼sse
>> Gert Franz
>> Customer Care
>> Railo Technologies GmbH
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> www.railo.ch
>>
>> Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei:
>> deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/
>> english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug Brown schrieb:
>>     
>>> A huge difference!! Number one is that you have the entire community
>>>       
> helping
>   
>>> to develop the project,  so bug fixes and features are done in record
>>>       
> time
>   
>>> instead of waiting on a "few" developers to bring you the things that
>>>       
> you
>   
>>> need the most. Why has mySql done so well? Gee I will answer that
>>>       
> myself.
>   
>>> MySql offers an open source product and were able to grow their client
>>>       
> base
>   
>>> while at the same time having the people that downloaded their software
>>>       
> also
>   
>>> develop their software and reduce their costs. Free and closed source
>>>       
> simply
>   
>>> means that we have to wait for you to implemnt things and that it takes
>>> longer for community acceptance.
>>>
>>> Doug B.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Gert Franz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "CF-Talk" <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 7:15 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> why? what's the difference between open source and free?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rick Root schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> For what it's worth, if Railo went open source.. now *THAT* would be
>>>>> interesting...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>       
>>     
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268995
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4

Reply via email to