Is it safe to assume that you're talking about CSS-based design when you mention "standards compliance" and previously "accessibility?"
Perhaps not, but if so, I've tried working with CSS (or table-less) design and it's a pain in the rear. Besides, when a client wants a site redesign, I want to have work to do! :o) Really, I tried CSS-based design, and it wasn't working for me... perhaps later. I just design for IE, and take the quirks in the layout, if there are any, in stride as far as the rest of the browsers are concerned. Perhaps not the most effective approach, but certainly a very efficient one! Rick -----Original Message----- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:49 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Client-side validation or Server-side Validation? Rick Faircloth wrote: <snip> > It's like coding for users of the Opera browser. If they want to be able > to have the best experience on my sites, then install IE. > > It's just too much work to cater to every minority group in the virtual > universe. And this is where I fundamentally disagree. Its really not that difficult at all. The newer generations of browsers have a large overlapping set of standards compliance. The largest quirks are fairly well known and easy to find out information on. The rise of javascript libraries has done a great job of taking into account the differences between browsers there. So what's the "too much work" part? Judah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:275442 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
