Oh I'm not knocking .NET integration. I'm sure that it helps a lot of folks. I'm just saying that I'd personally never use or buy a CFML server that was compiled in .NET. It's a personal fact, and I doubt I'm alone in that thought. That's all I was saying. ;)
I commend NewAtlanta for spearheading the CFML/.NET integration idea. It's interesting to me that Adobe is playing catch-up in this regard. NA is clearly an innovative company and I'm honored that they allow me to carry the brand of one of their products in my signature. ..NET just holds 0 interest or relevance for me. Warm regards, Jordan Michaels Vivio Technologies http://www.viviotech.net/ BlueDragon Alliance Member [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote: > And from a BD alliance member I would say that you should be used to > ColdFusion as a .NET language (albeit interpreted in it's current guise). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:280054 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
