There is absolutely no basis in this, why wouldn't you touch it? CFML upon ..NET would be the same as running CFML upon Java - it would probably run faster as well. <cfif> on ColdFusion on .NET would be exactly the same as ColdFusion using Java etc.
Is it just a stupid "anti-Microsoft" stance? I would say you are in the minority, certainly in the circles of technical fellows who understand and realise where .NET lies in the landscape.. I would be interested to see understand why it would have zero interest... "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com -----Original Message----- From: Jordan Michaels To: CF-Talk Sent: Mon Jun 04 23:03:31 2007 Subject: Re: Run PHP code inline on a Coldfusion page Oh I'm not knocking .NET integration. I'm sure that it helps a lot of folks. I'm just saying that I'd personally never use or buy a CFML server that was compiled in .NET. It's a personal fact, and I doubt I'm alone in that thought. That's all I was saying. ;) I commend NewAtlanta for spearheading the CFML/.NET integration idea. It's interesting to me that Adobe is playing catch-up in this regard. NA is clearly an innovative company and I'm honored that they allow me to carry the brand of one of their products in my signature. ...NET just holds 0 interest or relevance for me. Warm regards, Jordan Michaels Vivio Technologies http://www.viviotech.net/ BlueDragon Alliance Member [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote: > And from a BD alliance member I would say that you should be used to > ColdFusion as a .NET language (albeit interpreted in it's current guise). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:280076 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
