>> and certainly not organized enough to be innovative. I guess that all depends on your definition of innovative. I have been following the OBD mailing list and (off the top of my head) could any of these be defined as innovative?
Porting OBD to run on Google App Engine? Or support for Amazon Web services: S3 (well before Adobe did), SimpleDB and Simple Queue Service? Or rendering dynamic CFML code? Or a spell checker plugin? G? On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Larry Lyons <larrycly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > My thoughts - > > > [SNIP] > > If the OpenBD team claims it is not organized enough to submit ideas > > then they are most likely not organized enough to release a new > > version of OpenBD and certainly not organized enough to be innovative. > > This is unfortunate since the commercial version of BlueDragon used to > > be innovative. > > > > -- Gerald Guido http://www.myinternetisbroken.com "Wait. We can't stop here. This is bat country." -- HST ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:335652 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
