I think if I had read previous emails I would have had my answer before I asked. I was wondering mainly about COM. I have a very large app that I am developing using VB6 COM and CF 5. I have noticed that this is very slow with CF 5. The average page with a COM object on it loads in about 800-900 milliseconds. Which is very slow when compared to straight CF. I am scared that when the app is done and it gets hit by a thousand simultaneous users it will slow to a crawl. 900 milliseconds isn't too bad if it wont dramatically increase with traffic. Bandwidth wont be an issue. I wanted to know if CFMX was better or worse with COM. What I have been reading is that CFMX is very mean to COM. I may be converting my COM to CF. let me know what you all think.
Thanks, Dave -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5 and CFMX Not really, can you provide an example? ~Todd On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, David Jones wrote: > Has anyone experienced any issues with existing CF 5.0 code not functioning > properly after upgrading to CFMX? > > Thanks, > > Dave > -- ============================================================ Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ | http://www.flashCFM.com/ - webRat (Moderator) | http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator) | ============================================================ ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
