I have installed some application stress testing utilities. Depending on how the app does with a high amount of simulated traffic I may rewrite the COM's in CF. I just hate to have to do that.
Thanks, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:57 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5 and CFMX On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:03:44 -0500, in cf-talk you wrote: >Dave, > >CFMX uses a Java COM wrapper that was developed by a 3rd party and rolled >into CFMX. The name of the company that built it escapes me at the moment. >However, this added layer is probably not good news for COM centric CFML >code. A Macromedia rep told me they are hoping to release fixes for the problems with COM in the first MX service release. I get the feeling a programmer somewhere isn't getting much sleep of late. For your information the jintegra com<-->java interface a) is a slug and b) doesn't work very well, especially with COM properties. In fact isn't a single COM I have that works at all under CFMX if it involves setting a property. I rolled back to CF5 for the time being. --min ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
