Ditto! Glad to hear they're working on it.
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:12 PM Subject: RE: CF 5 and CFMX > I have installed some application stress testing utilities. Depending on how > the app does with a high amount of simulated traffic I may rewrite the COM's > in CF. I just hate to have to do that. > > Thanks, > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:57 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF 5 and CFMX > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:03:44 -0500, in cf-talk you wrote: > > >Dave, > > > >CFMX uses a Java COM wrapper that was developed by a 3rd party and rolled > >into CFMX. The name of the company that built it escapes me at the moment. > >However, this added layer is probably not good news for COM centric CFML > >code. > > A Macromedia rep told me they are hoping to release fixes for the > problems with COM in the first MX service release. I get the feeling a > programmer somewhere isn't getting much sleep of late. > > For your information the jintegra com<-->java interface a) is a slug > and b) doesn't work very well, especially with COM properties. In fact > isn't a single COM I have that works at all under CFMX if it involves > setting a property. > > I rolled back to CF5 for the time being. > > --min > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
