Ben, Please clarify for me. I'm a bit slow as others on the list can attest to. ;-)
Are you saying that in the background, CFMX will upload patches and hotfixes? And then CFMX will install those patches and hotfixes on the CFMX server? Thanks, Brian At 11:23 AM 7/12/02, you wrote: >Todd, > >I was in Newton this week and spent some time with the CF team, they are >reviewing this right now. A service pack is not out of the question, but >as I said, none is planned right now. > >The good news is that CFMX was designed to very easily allow patches or >hotfixes, CFMX itself looks for them and loads them automatically if >present (without needing a full reinstall as was the case in prior >CF's), so there are other options beyond service packs (options that can >be created and deployed far quicker and easier if needed). > >Now, I am not saying they'll be a patch or hotfix yet, but I am saying >that the few known problems areas (COM being the biggest) are being >looked at right now, and as soon as the engineering team has worked out >what the best course of action is they'll be an announcement. > >Heck, I'll post a message here myself as soon as I hear anything. > >--- Ben > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:07 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > >Ben, > >What about 3rd party upgrades...? Example given: Axis - Are those being > >released in the form of a patch or perhaps instructions on how to do it? > >Same thing with the jre? > >Just curious. > >~Todd > >On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Ben Forta wrote: > >> Douglas, >> >> Well, if you are planning to wait for an SP you could end up waiting >> for a long long time, there is no SP scheduled at this time. >> >> And while there have been posts here about problems upgrading, realize > >> that there are a couple of thousand subscribers to this list (and far >> less than that are regular contributors) and that is a very small >> percentage of the CF user base - the reality is that most users have >> not experienced upgrade problems at all. With the exception of COM >> (which is being looked at) and the documented changes (e.g. advanced >> security, dynamic database connections) this has actually been a very >> painless upgrade for most (far less painful than say CF3.x to CF4 or >> CF4 to CF4.5). >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> --- Ben > >-- >============================================================ >Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ | > Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion | >http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/ | >http://www.flashCFM.com/ - webRat (Moderator) | >http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator) | >============================================================ > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
