Actually, your grammar is fine, it's your spelling that's questionable. ;-)
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Cummings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:37 AM Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > BTW, that should be "accept", not "except" - hate looking like a grammar > idiot. :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Cummings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:19 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > Is it possible that you talked to support while CFMX was still in beta? > During beta testing, the method of support provided is the beta message > boards, however after CFMX was released, you shouldn't have been sent > back to a forum looking for an answer. If you were, except my apologies > on behalf of support, and contact me directly at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks, > JC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:03 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > "optimized for CF MX"? I don't think I even know what that means. Did > they give you specifics? > > --- Ben > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Lurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:59 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > Hey, they told ME I had to rewrite my code so it'd be 'optimized for CF > MX'. At least you got sent to a message board. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:54 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > I have contacted support and they turned me over to the message boards > at Macromedia. > > They were not that helpful. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:51 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > If you are running into problems like that I hope you have already been > in touch with tech support so that they can get to the bottom of this. > Of the situations you listed the only one that I am familiar with is > <CFOBJECT> errors (I am assuming you are referring to COM integration). > Not that I am claiming to know of every problem everyone is running > into, but ... if you do have reproducible problems please contact tech > support. > > Oh, and I'm pretty fond of CF myself too. :-) > > --- Ben > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:54 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > I really hate to be negative about Cold Fusion. I LOVE THIS LANGUAGE! I > live breathe and eat CF! > > How about getting regular, good old fashion, MX running first? MX is > the only version that I am ashamed of telling my colleagues that I work > with it. > > We continue to have major ODBC/JDBC errors and there has been nothing > said from Macromedia about getting it resolved. CFObject keeps throwing > around errors about methods.... The service crashes up to 8 times a day > on development servers barely under a load.... > > Help.... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:31 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > Additional J2EE servers are being discussed and considered, but nothing > has been decided yet. Any decisions have to be driven by their sales > potential, so feedback and requests are useful and important. I'll pass > on your vote. > > --- Ben > > > -----Original Message----- > X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > From: Trey Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:44 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > Are there no plans for CFMX for the Oracle9ias J2EE server? > > If so, I would volunteer as that is our choice in J2EE application > serving > > Trey Rouse > Internet Project Supervisor > Web Services - Rice University > MS 119 - 713.348.4799 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Margaret Waters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:20 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: CFMX beta volunteers needed > > > > We're about to launch the beta program for CFMX for J2EE servers. > We're > > looking for beta volunteers to test the new ColdFusion MX for J2EE > release > > on JRun 4. The existing release of CFMX runs on an integrated version > of > > JRun. This beta release is for a ColdFusion MX server that sits on top > of > > JRun 4, IBM WebSphere, or Sun ONE(iPlanet web server). > > > > We're looking for developers with experience running both CF and these > app > > servers. Please send me an email if you're interested in > participating, > > and note which beta program you'd like to join: IBM WebSphere, JRun 4, > or > > Sun ONE. > > > > thanks, > > > > Margaret Waters > > > > > > Margaret M. Waters > > Product Manager > > Macromedia, Inc. > > 617-219-2138 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
