Steven Brownlee wrote:
> >>What other methodologies? The only other methodologies I've come
> >>across are variations of Fusebox and CFObjects. And CFObjects isn't
> >>an option because it relies so heavily on unscalable custom tags.
> In what way are the tags unscalable?
Matt says they're unscalable and I was replying to his post. I've never
actually looked into it myself.
> Anyone else who has experience developing real apps with cfObjects feel
> free to kick in on this one. I find it so hard to get honest, valuable
> feedback on the framework that I take every opportunity to get it.
> Usually I just get "it's too hard to learn", which I simply chalk up to
> "I don't understand it".
I haven't tried to actually build an application with cfObjects but
it looks pretty straightforward. To me it's not a question of Fusebox
vs. cfObjects. It's more cfObjects vs. a pure OO language (vs.
CF with OO middleware). Is there a real advantage or is cfObjects a
work-around for clients who are committed to CF? Have you done any
work beyond simply making Cold Fusion OO?
Patrick
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
