You forgot accomodation, spending money needs a bit more padding as well.
That and transfers between hotels etc. Oh and dinners oh and lunches...

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Plane Tickets $2k pp = $8k
>
> Spending Money $2k
>
> Total = $10k
>
>
>
> Which means $5-$10k worth of coke, no wonder your body gets confused :)
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Dale Fraser
>
> http://learncf.com
>
> http://flexcf.com
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
> *Sent:* Thursday, 22 May 2008 5:03 AM
> *To:* cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [cfaussie] Re: Microsoft Uses Flash!!!
>
>
>
> Or for Disneyland packages:
>
>
>
> "Come to Disneyland, spend 15hrs on a plane, pay around $15-20k in total
> for 4 people only to line up for 60mins per ride in 35 degree heat with
> little or no shade whilst drinking Coke (see below) that has enormous
> amounts of Corn Syrup which your body gets confused over and decides to
> store as fat" - Believe in the Magic.
>
>
>
> (sorry, that was my exp anyway heheh). Anyway it's about promoting a
> experience, people want to hear the positives and the experience associated
> to the said products, it's the glass is always half full
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Nope, more towards the one after yours.
>
>
>
> As for the "Widgetsoft"... fair enough, don't agree but understand with
> regards to your current opinion. Everything someone does to promote a
> product will have marketing spin to it, as all marketers are liars (Seth
> Godin). I mean would you buy coke if it had on the package:
>
>
>
> "Will rot your teeth, give you a massive sugar high with an equal massively
> low to follow and although you assume you're re-hydrating your body, you're
> in fact dehydrating it more"
>
>
>
> Scott.
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Mike Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Scott, it you're referring to my post in this thread,  I specifcally
> said that it isnt a "Microsoft is the evil empire" rant.  It's about
> how so many people (not just Microsoft but they're the most prominent
> offender in my view) think that merely using the name of something is
> enough.
>
> How many times have we all seen someone announce proudly that 'version
> 3.2 of WIdgetSoft is now released!!"  and wondered, "what the hell is
> WIdgetSoft?"
>
> I have a machine that's groaning under the weight of around 100
> processes.  It's working ok, but if i installed everything that people
> wanted me to install, then I'd end up with a bazillion conflicts and a
> whole lot of precious RAM used up for things i don't need.  As it is,
> i havent got a clue what some of those 100 processes are.   I just
> know that if i close some of them, things break.  So I leave them
> running, and trust my anti-virus to make sure they're all ok.     So
> my policy is 'just because someone says i need to install this, is not
> good enough reason.  I need to decide for myself whether i need to
> install it."  I remember back to the days when i had Real Audio
> installed, and it kept taking charge of things and changing my
> settings, installing spyware and other things.  it was a thoroughly
> unpleasant piece of software to have on my machine.
>
> And I had two calls this week from clients asking me what this
> "Silverlight" thing is, and should they install it.   I was hoping to
> be able to call them back and say something like "yes it's ok to
> install.  have a look at <http://url here> and you can see for
> yourself what it does".   But there's no such page.  The one that I
> eventually found after 5 clicks to get there by the most direct route,
> says  things like : "Custom branded experiences using 2D vector
> graphics, animation, styling, and skinning".    I think i know what
> that means but it's totally meaningless to my client who's a furniture
> manufacturer.   And the other client who makes and imports
> high-performance car parts, doesnt understand the difference between
> Vista and XP.  Is confused about the difference between RAM and hard
> drive storage.    I wouldnt even try to explain it to him.  It's a
> pity that Microsoft didnt think any of those uses might want to know
> what it is.
>
> Some more examples of this lack of explanation:    When Windows Update
> says i need to update my machine,  i just get a message saying "you
> have some updates"  but no easy way to find out what those updates
> are, and decide whether I need them.    or XPPro Service Pack 3 - says
> there are some feature enhancements included, but no way to find out
> what those enhahcements are.  (I have discovered after installing SP3
> that my Remote Desktop no longer works, so presumably the SP3 changed
> something there without my knowledge or approval.   I now have to
> spend time tracking it down and changing whatever it is back again).
>
> A few years ago, I found myself on someone's mailing list and was
> bombarded with stuff about an international SOA conference that was
> coming up.  I had never seen that term before, and nowhere did they
> use the term in full, so i found myself curious as to what SOA was,
> and was it some technology i needed to know about.   It went on for
> weeks - SOA this and SOA that - inviting people to this SOA conference
> - the speakers and SOA experts speaking at the conference none of whom
> i'd ever heard of.   I assumed it was something in IT but no idea what
> SOA was.   So their entire marketing was wasted on me at least.
> Perhaps they figured 'if they dont know what SOA is, they're not going
> to spend thousands to come to the conference."     Probably right i
> suppose, but all it would have taken was a simple sentence saying what
> SOA is, or maybe just spelling out the term in full once.  ONCE.
> Yes, I know that Google is my friend, and i could have gone looked it
> up, but why should i bother.  It's THEIR product.  THEY are the ones
> wanting me to spend my money on it.   In fact if you do google "SOA",
> you'll find lots of references to SOA and rarely find a single mention
> of "Service Oriented Architecture".  And a plain-language explanation
> of that term is even more rare.
>
> So this isnt just a Microsoft thing.  I've often seen here on
> ColdFusion lists someone proudly anounce that the latest version of
> their application is released,  but just assuming everyone knows what
> it is and what it does.  I find myself frequently asking myself, "do I
> care?  Is that something I should know about?"  More often than not, i
> say 'no - cant be bothered right now."   And all it would have taken
> is a simple "for those that havent seen it yet,   WidgetSoft is a
> small, application that gets you coffee when you need it, and delivers
> it to you desk 15 seconds before you think of the idea."
>
> Crisp, plain language that is free of marketing gobbldegook and
> motherhood statements. Phrases like "gives users a richer experience"
> should be banned, because every product since DOS has claimed that and
> it's meaningless.
>
> That's all I'm saying.  And I mentioned Microsoft because it was the
> Silverlight download thing that prompted two clients in one morning to
> ask me the same thing, when with a little bit of thought and a little
> less arrogance, the marketing people who thought up such splendid
> graphics on that SIlverlight page could have explained it themselves
> and saved everyone a lot of trouble.  It's their bloody product after
> all, not mine.
>
> One of the great truths of motivation is 'if you want to persuade
> people to do something - get their credit cards out and buy something,
>  change their opinions,  vote for you, join your religion, install
> your software - you have to paint a vivid picture of them getting the
> benefits.  They have to be imagining themselves better off in some way
> as a result of doing what you want them to do. Confounding them with
> flowery gobbledegook and motherhood statements wont do it.
>
>
> Of course you might not have been referring to my post.  In which case
> i've taken the opportunity to rant again.   And im not sorry. <g>
>
>
> Cheers
> Mike Kear
> Windsor, NSW, Australia
> Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
> AFP Webworks
> http://afpwebworks.com
> ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET <http://asp.net/> hosting from AUD$15/month
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I have no idea what your point was :)
> >
> > Is this another "Microsoft is a monopolistic company therefore they are
> evil
> > - sent via Windows owned PC" rant?
> > Confidence in which customer? Do you think the average say "YouTube"
> punter
> > sits there and ponders about Adobe's ethics, their history and overall
> what
> > does this runtime install mean to me should I hit "Install". I think the
> > whole Flash vs Silverlight debate's are stupid, as usually it's used as a
> > soapbox to denounce Microsoft which *shrug* each to their own. I like the
> > company I work for as do billions of other folks around the world.
> >
> > We have 1.5million+ downloads a day of the runtime. If there were no
> > confidence in the product, it would decrease, not increase?
> >
>
> --
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes
> http://www.mossyblog.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Scott Barnes
> http://www.mossyblog.com
>
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.mossyblog.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to