dougpuob marked 2 inline comments as not done. dougpuob added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ReservedIdentifierCheck.h:44 llvm::Optional<FailureInfo> - GetDeclFailureInfo(const StringRef &TypeName, const NamedDecl *Decl, + getDeclFailureInfo(const StringRef &TypeName, const NamedDecl *Decl, const SourceManager &SM) const override; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Given that the other functions in the class use the wrong style of casing, we > should probably leave this declaration alone so it doesn't become locally > inconsistent. Do you mean create another function with three parameters for it? ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/IdentifierNamingCheck.cpp:428 case IdentifierNamingCheck::CT_HungarianNotation: { const NamedDecl *pNamedDecl = dyn_cast<NamedDecl>(pDecl); ---------------- njames93 wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > I feel like I must be missing something because I don't have this enum in > > my copy of ToT despite pulling this morning. Is the patch missing some > > content? > I feel like this is an incremental diff based on the first version of this > patch rather than a diff from trunk. @aaron.ballman and @njames93, the diff is based on first version not from master(trunk). Is it the best way that I should merge with the latest master(trunk) every time before updating the diffs ? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86671/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86671 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits