BRevzin added a comment. In D78938#2258557 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D78938#2258557>, @jhenderson wrote:
> Not that I have anything particularly against this, but won't this likely rot > fairly rapidly? It's not like LLVM is even on C++17 let alone C++20 yet, so > trying to make it work like the latter when it's just going to break again > seems a bit like wasted effort to me. People will want to write C++20 programs that use LLVM headers, so I think it's important to help let them do that. Sure, it may rot, but incremental fixes down the line will be smaller. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78938/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78938 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
