steveire added a comment. In D95168#2532258 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168#2532258>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> I wonder if we should consider suggesting a different type of tool for clang > > `clang-reformat` > > A place where changes such as this and east/west fixer could be actively > encouraged. I don't think this should be done. These kinds of things should be in `clang-format`. One of the advantages of this and east/west const being in clang-format is that editors, CI systems and other tools have clang-format support. They would be unlikely to get support for a new tool. There are plenty of clang tools which exist but which don't get enough attention to get support in editors CI tools etc. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95168 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
