JonasToth marked 2 inline comments as done.
JonasToth added inline comments.


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-const-correctness-templates.cpp:16
+  int value_int = 42;
+  // CHECK-MESSAGES:[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: variable 'value_int' of type 'int' 
can be declared 'const'
+}
----------------
LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> `CHECK-FIXES`?
see my comment in the other test.


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-const-correctness-transform-pointer-as-values.cpp:12
+  // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: variable 'p_local0' of type 
'double *' can be declared 'const'
+  // CHECK-FIXES: const
+}
----------------
0x8000-0000 wrote:
> LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> > Shouldn't this validate that the `const` was placed in the correct position?
> > e.g. `const double *` is a different meaning from `double *const`
> > 
> > Apply to all the other `CHECK-FIXES` as well
> Can we have the checker merged in first, then we can worry about the 
> automatic fixer?
the checker is its own utility with its own tests and proper test coverage.
yes `const double*` and `double* const` are different and are correctly 
inserted, but that is not tested here, but here: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang-tools-extra/unittests/clang-tidy/AddConstTest.cpp

Similar to the actual `const` analysis. That has its own test-suite 
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/unittests/Analysis/ExprMutationAnalyzerTest.cpp)

The tests here are concerned with the diagnostics and "real" code. Afterall, 
this functionality is too complex to have all of it checked with these kind of 
tests.
I think the separate testing in specialized unit-tests (as is now) for the 
specialized functions is the right approach and the `CHECK-FIXES` are not 
necessary in this instance, maybe even bad, because it makes the tests 
unclearer.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to