awarzynski added a comment. In D125788#3519297 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125788#3519297>, @DavidSpickett wrote:
> Can we expect the current `flang-new`, soon to be `flang` to also cope with > these tests (I have no expectations myself here, fine if not) or should we > move the bots to use `flang-to-gfortran`? Great point, thank for highlighting it! Moving the bots to `flang-to-gfortran` would make most sense. I can split this change into two patches so that there's no disruption from the buildbot perspective: - patch 1: rename `flang` as `flang-to-gfortran`, but keep `flang` as an alias for `flang-to-gfortran`, - patch 2: all the remaining changes from this patch. Once "patch 1" is merged, we can update the buildbot config to use `flang-to-gfortran`. After that, we could land "patch 2". Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125788/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125788 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
