banach-space wrote: > > No against reverting, but is the problem just missing a > > `-fclang-abi-compat=23`? I think it's also ok to commit a seperate patch > > for it. > > +1; I think a revert is fine to give breathing room but I think fixing it > forward to give an ABI compat flag is also fine if done quickly enough
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/220901 > Are there bots that should have reported that breakage? The only report that > I can see is for https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/48978 We (Arm) are about to add a ClangIR bot - it's already running downstream and we are in the process of connecting it to LLVM's master bot. For that to happen, the bot needs to be 🟢 and stable (to minimise the changes to llvm-zorg). If that's OK with you, please accept and land my reverting patch 🙏🏻 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/216777 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
