On 4 Dec 2008, at 19:33, Mimi Yin wrote: > Hi Graham, > > I think you've found a wrinkle in the workflow. … Would you mind > logging a bug for that? > > Thanks! > Mimi > > On Dec 4, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Graham Perrin wrote: > >> My footnote at <http://www.brighton.ac.uk/centrim/Members/gjp4/2008/12/02 >> > refers to interop issues, probably involving Apple Sync Services. >> In a nutshell: >> >> * a note added to Chandler, observed in iCal (as a To Do Item), >> then added to the calendar in Chandler, will not appear in the >> calendar in >> iCal >> >> -- and vice versa, and variations on that theme.
Hi Mimi On 3rd December I bugged <https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12459> and <https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12460> (both are referenced under 'Known issues' in my blog entry). I guess that both issues are primarily interop, but as their secondary effects can cause loss/confusion of data (at least: loss of communication of data) I have suggested P3 critical. I'm prepared for developers to disagree with the priority/severity :) > Notes that are added to the calendar should probably show up in iCal > on the calendar instead of the To-do list. An item that's initiated within the calendar of Chandler Hub (or Chandler Desktop) does appear in the calendar of iCal, and vice versa. An item that's initiated _without the calendar_ of Chandler Hub (or Chandler Desktop) does appear as a To Do Item in iCal, and vice versa. The problems begin, and continue, when an item is moved to, or from, a calendar in any of the following: * Chandler Hub * Chandler Desktop * iCal 3. Would you like a separate bug for each variation on that theme? There could be a few. (I suspect that resolution of either 12459 or 12460 will resolve a variety of issues. I aim to avoid duplication of issues.) >> probably involving Apple Sync Services. It's interesting that Sync Services somehow exclude To Do Items from iCal when working with iPhone. I wonder whether Apple quietly acknowledge the diverse approaches to To Do Items * for example: in Chandler Hub and Desktop, an item is either scheduled or not scheduled; in contrast, iCal can associate a due date (a schedule) with a To Do Item without calendaring that item -- and whether Apple are therefore deferring more comprehensive synchronisation with iPhone until after the next CalConnect Interoperability Test Event and Roundtable, February 2009 <http://www.calconnect.org/calconnect14.shtml >. Is this class of issue (12459, 12460) the type of thing that you might expect to be resolved, or at least tabled/discussed at such events? Regards Graham _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
