Graham Perrin wrote: > > Bug reported to Apple, radr://6487928 > > … Where Apple iCal 3.0.6 (1273) fails, Sunbird 0.9 succeeds. … > > … Should forthcoming CalConnect XIV be a guiding factor in a situation > such as this? >
I have updated the Apple bug report to highlight the success of Sunbird. (CalConnect Interoperability Test Event has ended, I wonder whether Apple raised this issue.) Mimi Yin wrote: > > … independent of where you initiate the workflow: Desktop, Hub or iCal … > Interestingly, this morning I began with iCal, working with one of my collections on the Hub: • added a To Do Item • allowed time for a refresh • dragged the To Do to the calendar • allowed time for a refresh • half-expected a warning or error message, but none presented. Then I logged in to the Hub and found the event neatly, properly in the calendar. So (without trawling through all notes) I suspect that the bug may bite: • only with notes that are moved to/from the calendar in Chandler Desktop or Hub • only if any move to/from the calendar occurs after iCal has gained a sense of that note. -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Re%3A-Chandler-and-iCal-3-misrepresentation-of-schedule-less-notes-that-become-scheduled%2C-and-variations-on-that-theme-tp1660163p2297116.html Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
