Hi Graham, Thanks for logging your bugs, I think the 2 bugs you logged will be sufficient to nail down the problem (which I believe i independent of where you initiate the workflow: Desktop, Hub or iCal).
Best, Mimi On Dec 8, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Graham Perrin wrote: > On 4 Dec 2008, at 19:33, Mimi Yin wrote: > >> Hi Graham, >> >> I think you've found a wrinkle in the workflow. … Would you mind >> logging a bug for that? >> >> Thanks! >> Mimi >> >> On Dec 4, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Graham Perrin wrote: >> >>> My footnote at <http://www.brighton.ac.uk/centrim/Members/ >>> gjp4/2008/12/02 >>>> refers to interop issues, probably involving Apple Sync Services. >>> In a nutshell: >>> >>> * a note added to Chandler, observed in iCal (as a To Do Item), >>> then added to the calendar in Chandler, will not appear in the >>> calendar in >>> iCal >>> >>> -- and vice versa, and variations on that theme. > > Hi Mimi > > On 3rd December I bugged > <https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12459> and > <https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12460> (both are > referenced under 'Known issues' in my blog entry). > > I guess that both issues are primarily interop, but as their secondary > effects can cause loss/confusion of data (at least: loss of > communication of data) I have suggested P3 critical. I'm prepared for > developers to disagree with the priority/severity :) > >> Notes that are added to the calendar should probably show up in iCal >> on the calendar instead of the To-do list. > > An item that's initiated within the calendar of Chandler Hub (or > Chandler Desktop) does appear in the calendar of iCal, and vice versa. > > An item that's initiated _without the calendar_ of Chandler Hub (or > Chandler Desktop) does appear as a To Do Item in iCal, and vice versa. > > The problems begin, and continue, when an item is moved to, or from, a > calendar in any of the following: > > * Chandler Hub > * Chandler Desktop > * iCal 3. > > Would you like a separate bug for each variation on that theme? There > could be a few. > > (I suspect that resolution of either 12459 or 12460 will resolve a > variety of issues. I aim to avoid duplication of issues.) > >>> probably involving Apple Sync Services. > > It's interesting that Sync Services somehow exclude To Do Items from > iCal when working with iPhone. > > I wonder whether Apple quietly acknowledge the diverse approaches to > To Do Items > > * for example: in Chandler Hub and Desktop, an item is either > scheduled or not scheduled; in contrast, iCal can associate a due date > (a schedule) with a To Do Item without calendaring that item > > -- and whether Apple are therefore deferring more comprehensive > synchronisation with iPhone until after the next CalConnect > Interoperability Test Event and Roundtable, February 2009 <http:// > www.calconnect.org/calconnect14.shtml >> . > > Is this class of issue (12459, 12460) the type of thing that you might > expect to be resolved, or at least tabled/discussed at such events? > > Regards > Graham > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ > chandler-users > Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list unsubscribe here: http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users Chandler wiki: http://chandlerproject.org/wikihome
