On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:20:02PM -0400, Aaron Guy Davies wrote: > This reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask someone: would a > standard webmail site, ie Hotmail, Yahoo, etc., if accessed *entirely* > thru anonymizing proxies, from account setup on, be considered securely > anonymous? It depends on the anonymity of the anonymizing proxy, but with a robust anonymizing proxy, which routed through several independent machines, I see no reason why not. Ian.
- [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibility Nomen Nescio
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Seth Johnson
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Nomen Nescio
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Seth Johnson
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Volker Stolz
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Volker Stolz
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... David McNab
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Aaron Guy Davies
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibi... David McNab