> This reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask someone: would a
> standard webmail site, ie Hotmail, Yahoo, etc., if accessed *entirely*
> thru anonymizing proxies, from account setup on, be considered securely
> anonymous?
It depends on whether the anonymizing proxy keeps access logs.
Also, many of these webmail facilities won't sign you up without an exchange
of cookies.
I don't exactly know what goes in these cookies, but I suspect that they may
include one's physical IP address.
Hushmail is the only webmail service I know of that doesn't stick you IP
address on messages sent.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Guy Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 07:20
Subject: Re: [freenet-chat] Re: Node operators responsibility
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, David McNab wrote:
>
> > Make sure to use an offshore anonymous mailing facility, like hushmail
> > or better.
>
> This reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask someone: would a
> standard webmail site, ie Hotmail, Yahoo, etc., if accessed *entirely*
> thru anonymizing proxies, from account setup on, be considered securely
> anonymous?
> --
> __ __
> / ) / )
> /--/ __. __ ________ / / __. , __o _ _
> / (_(_/|_/ (_(_) / / <_ /__/_(_/|_\/ <__</_/_)_
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chat mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
>
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
