On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:59:13PM -0400, Evan Daniel wrote: > On 7/12/05, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /me renames Freenet PornNet. ;) > > > > I have friends who rsync their porn. But I can see your point. Is this > > an issue only for porn? What class of material is subject to this > > consideration? Personally I avoid material that could be used to > > blackmail me, traceable or not. > > And I have friends who watch porn in coed groups. I think they're > weird, but then they probably say the same about my ex-poultry :)
Co-ed groups? > Other classes of material: anything that could be seen as incitement > to revolt probably counts. The difference between rebels that history > approves of vs condemns appears to be decided after the fact. Having > Freenet be relevant to revolutions would be damaged by this, right? So if you are trying to start a revolution, and the network as a whole disapproves, you don't want that fact to be revealed to your "friends". > And it seems entirely reasonable for me to want to anonymize my > revolutionary plots by mixing them up with other people's searches for > deceased fowls. > > Writings about drug use also come to mind, though these seem to be > relatively accepted on the public internet. That probably isn't as > true in, say, much of Asia, though. > > > > > Your privacy against local nodes is only an issue if your content is > > voted down. > > If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear. Hah. > > Evan Daniel -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ chat mailing list chat@freenetproject.org Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
