DivX;-) is pretty good really. Unless you have a digital screen (such as a monitor) or like to pause and zoom in on the screen I doubt you'd see a lot of difference. I certainly don't. However I am thinking of spending the $600 or so for a decent DVD burner. One thing I like about vcd's, DivX;-) cd's, etc is I can throw out all those crappy extras. I want the movies and only the movies.
I don't suffer from insanity... I enjoy every minute of it. ;):):-):):-):):-)8') Michael McGlothlin <mogmios at mlug.missouri.edu> http://mlug.missouri.edu/~mogmios/projects/ On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Mr. Smith wrote: > --- krepta at juno.com wrote: > > Well, sounds to me like DVD is way better than DivX. > > Why would anyone > > want to make a CD-Movie recording out of a DVD? > > Well to some extent that's apples and oranges. DVD > and CD are storage mediums, while DivX is a > compression format. However, you are correct, having > a DVD would be optimal. > > I believe the ad is targetted at gullible people who > don't own DVD players/recorders trying to convince > them that this product will do the same thing (which > it doesn't really). > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! > http://greetings.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Chat mailing list > Chat at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat > _______________________________________________ Chat mailing list Chat at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
