Well said Mike! Quoting Mike Holleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The key lesson for us from this post is to respect another's passion for > whatever vehicle spins their wheels. I came of age(turned sixteen) in 1967. > My passion has always been for the cars built between 64/67, with the 65 > being the apple of my eye. I did not care for the change that took place in > the Chevelles in 68. Even today they are somewhat so so to my eye. It's all > in your personal perspective. I have learned to love all the old cars, yes > even some of the F--ds. And I have seen some really well done late model El > Caminos. It's all about the passion. > Mike Holleman > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: The Chevelle Mailing List > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:11 AM > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] New to the El Camino world ( tell it like it > is) > > > Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder! I had a documented! Protecto-Plate > 1970 SS, and sold it for a good coin and bought a 1968 SS undocumented except > for VIN tag. My beleif is a "68" is great because there aren't as many on the > road, and I'm not like 3 other Velle's in the subdivision!!! Not chiming in > to argue, just voicing what is fact. > > Sincerely, > > Jeff Wysocki > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > In a message dated 4/11/2005 12:30:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > WELL LARRY ITS A 69 POST BIG BLOCK WHICH WOULD BLOW YOUR'S AWAY, IN > VALUE, AND LOOKS SO MIND YOUR OWN BUISNESS > Big stinkin' deal. I know 3 guys that have the same car and unless it > has documentation it's considered a CLONE. Besides, everyone knows that 1970 > is the best looking and most desirable. Regardless, you're still a dick. > Hey, you're the one that says speak the truth, well there it is. > > Tom
