The Prop valve is from a '69, I think. No such pin as you mention. 2 inputs, 3 outputs, 1 idiot wire plug-in (currently not utilized). I took the 1st MC back, and got another just like it. It seems to be working better.

I finally got the fronts to bleed!!! And the front wheels are done. This has not been fun.

Now the rears won't bleed at all, haven't moved an ounce from the resevoir. I can see bubbles move forward/back as the pedal is pumped (1 man bleed kit), so I know that the lines are clear and not kinked. At least some air is getting moved at the rear wheel cylinder as the pedal is pumped.

I did bench bleed the MC, that went fine.

I'm going to let it sitt over night hoping to let the gravity do it's thing.
I don't think I've ever had this much trouble bleeding brakes!!

Thanks for the suggestions.
Mike

--
 I would rather live my life as if there is a God, and die to find out there 
isn't, Than live my
 life as if there isn't, And die to find out there is. -Blaise Pascal
Check out my webpage at http://www.ProStreetCar.com
 TREMEC Distributor at http://www.5speedTransmissions.com
 Team Chevelle member #1778 (Gold),  ACES member #1377
 Hoosier State Chevelle Assoc (http://www.IndianaChevelles.com) #6



Rick Schaefer wrote:

  Mike
  What year?  And where can you not get fluid?  Front/rear/both?
For 72 anyway, there is a pin on the proportioning valve that must be pressed in to get flow to the rear.

On 4/20/07, *Michael Pell* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Thanks, but what do you mean by 'off center"?

    --
    I would rather live my life as if there is a God, and die to find
    out there isn't, Than live my
    life as if there isn't, And die to find out there is. -Blaise Pascal

    Check out my webpage at http://www.ProStreetCar.com
    TREMEC Distributor at http://www.5speedTransmissions.com
    Team Chevelle member #1778 (Gold),  ACES member #1377
    Hoosier State Chevelle Assoc (http://www.IndianaChevelles.com) #6



    Mark Tibbits wrote:

    > What brake lines did you replace? The por. valve might be off
    centered
    > is the brake light on? You might have to have to press. bleed the
    > system.If you are bleeding the fronts you might have to bleed
    the rear
    > first. Some times if the por. valve is off center you can drive the
    > car as long as you have some brake pedal and then try again. If the
    > brake light is on the por, vale is off center.
    > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Pell"
    > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
    > To: "ChevelleList" <chevelle-list@chevelles.net
    <mailto:chevelle-list@chevelles.net>>
    > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:59 PM
    > Subject: [Chevelle-list] Help bleeding brakes
    >
    >
    >> I replaced the MC and and brake lines, and can't get any fluid to
    >> flow through the lines.
    >> I did successfully bleed the MC seperately, so I know that part is
    >> working.
    >>
    >> I even , gulp, read the directions.  Open the bleeder open on the
    >> brake pedal downstroke, close it before brake pedal gets to the
    bottom.
    >> I can hear and see the air moving a bit in the clear hose from the
    >> bleeder to the cup .
    >>
    >> Any tips on how to get the fluid down the lines?
    >> Thanks,
    >> Mike
    >>
    >> --
    >> --
    >>  I would rather live my life as if there is a God, and die to find
    >> out there isn't, Than live my
    >>  life as if there isn't, And die to find out there is. -Blaise
    Pascal
    >>  Check out my webpage at http://www.ProStreetCar.com
    <http://www.ProStreetCar.com>
    >>  TREMEC Distributor at http://www.5speedTransmissions.com
    >>  Team Chevelle member #1778 (Gold),  ACES member #1377
    >>  Hoosier State Chevelle Assoc ( http://www.IndianaChevelles.com) #6
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >




--
Rick Schaefer
72 TPI El Camino

------------------------------------------------------------------------


Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.5.5/769 - Release Date: 4/19/2007 5:56 PM

Reply via email to